Blog Articles

Why Yoga Matters - Buddhiyuktaḥ - Part One

4/26/2020

Why Yoga Matters - Buddhiyuktaḥ - Part One
Evenness, balance, integration: the platform for greater skilfulness. This is yoga. To cultivate it, we practise the medi-state.

Buddhiyuktaḥ -Yoga, the medi-state and why it matters

The basic practice of yoga is meditation, the cultivation of a state of integration which is the platform for skilful, spacious, appropriate response. One useful way this state is described in the yoga tradition by Kṛṣṇa in the Bhagavad Gītā is as being buddhiyuktaḥ - at once: integrated through all the constituent powers of our awareness, and connected to ‘buddhi’, the most refined part of our awareness.
Why does yoga matter? Why is it worth making the effort to cultivate yoga, the medi-state of balance, integration and connection to the most refined part of our awareness? Life is better, richer, fuller when we can meet it buddhiyuktaḥ. We can meet it more skilfully. So what does it mean to be buddhiyuktaḥ? Why is it so helpful? Here, we will look at two complementary descriptions of this ‘joined up’, integrated state of yoga. We’ll look at the ‘map’ of the reality of our being from the Indian school of Sāṅhkya philosophy that Yoga also uses and assumes a familiarity with, and which Kṛṣṇa is referring to when he talks about being buddhiyuktaḥ. We’ll also look at the brilliant ‘hand model of the brain’ that contemporary neuroscientist Dr Dan Siegel uses to help illustrate what it means to be integrated.

Living a ‘joined up’, congruent life

Yoga is joining, or the state of being integrated and ‘joined up’.

When we are ‘joined up’ and congruent, how do we feel? Pretty good, great even. When our thought, word and deed are all aligned with our conscience, does it not feel wonderful? When we live as an expression of the true longings of our heart and soul, we feel great.
But when we are incongruent, when our thought, speech and action are not aligned, when we ignore or strategise against our conscience, we suffer.
Is this not true?
This is a foundational premise in yoga. Yoga means to connect. Life is better when we are connected to our conscience: when we are congruent, attuned, in harmony, when we are living as the true expression of our soul. When however we are disconnected, out of whack, we suffer. Disintegrated, energy and information does not circulate so freely through the circuits of our being, we become imbalanced, parts of ourselves get neglected, undernourished, confined to the shadows. We are not able to respond as skilfully to the inevitable challenges and change of life.
We humans sometimes resist change. We seem to like to cling to ‘certainties’, but most of them are false.
Some exceptions:
We are all going to die. We exist in nature: the realm of life, of birth and death, of expansion and contraction, pulsation and cycles. Between the two great changes of birth and death, what can we be certain of apart from change?
Yoga asks us to remember that as human beings with two eyes there will always be more that we cannot see than we can. Like other great systems of practical philosophy, yoga asks that we cultivate our capacity to be steady amidst uncertainty, and our capacity to admit and allow differing views.
We are much better able to do these things when we are ‘joined up’, connected, integrated, or what Kṛṣṇa, the teacher in the Bhagavad Gītā, calls buddhiyuktaḥ.
Recently, I have been encouraged to see some contemporary neuroscientists teaching some of the same yogic truths that the great research scientists of the ancient Indian tradition laid out millennia ago. Contemporary scientists like Dr Dan Siegel and Dr Bruce Lipton agree that when we are integrated, connected, joined up, we can live ‘better’: more healthily, more skilfully, more enjoyably. We can live more how we’d really like to. And further, when we are integrated, or buddhiyuktaḥ, we can deal much more skilfully with life: with the unexpected and with things that might challenge or shake us.
This is powerfully illustrated by Kṛṣṇa’s description of being buddhiyuktaḥ and by Dr Dan Siegel’s brilliant ‘hand model of the brain’. Before we consider these beautifully complementary explanations, I’d first like to set out the foundational map of awareness that the great ṛṣi-s (research scientists/seers) of the Indian tradition laid out.

The Ganglands of our Being - Tattva-s and Gaṇa-s

The Ganglands of our Being - Tattva-s and Gaṇa-s

The ṛṣi-s, the great seers and research scientists of the Indian tradition, recognised that when we are conscious beings, puruṣa-s, when we come into embodied existence in prakṛti, the realm of nature, our embodied consciousness experiences through different constituent parts. The ṛṣi-s recognised that there are different members of the group of our being. These are referred to in Sanskṛt as gaṇa-s, ‘members of the gang’ that make up the collective of who we are. They are also known at tattva-s. Literally ‘thatnesses’. Tat means ‘that’ in the sense of that which is, which exists. The suffix ‘tva’ is a bit like ‘ness’ in English, ‘having the quality of’. The tattva-s/gaṇa-s all have the quality of existing in the collective of our being. Yoga is about bringing all these members of the gang of our being into dynamic equilibrium, so they can support us to meet life as skilfully as possible: enjoying, learning and growing as life unfolds.
With the model of the tattva-s, the ṛṣi-s of the Indian tradition bequeathed us a very practical ‘map’ of the ‘ganglands’ of our being. The ṛṣi-s recognised that we each contain the five elements of earth, water, fire, air and space. And so we also have and experience five associated qualities of fragrance, taste, form, tactility and sound/vibration. As sentient beings we are also endowed with amazing powers of action, which we can also describe in a group of five. One: our powers of speech, expression, communication - which for us humans includes our linguistic capacities. Two: our manual dexterity and capabilities, the ability to grasp, pick up and put down. Three, our diverse movement and locomotive capacities. Four, our powers of digestion, assimilation, excretion and elimination; and five: our creative, recreative and procreative capacities. Then we also have our five sense powers of smell, taste, vision, touch and hearing.
So far then, working from gross to subtle, we have seen twenty tattva-s, twenty gaṇa-s. Continuing in this map of our reality, we come to what is referred to in Sanskṛt as the antaḥ karaṇa - the ‘internal instrument’, which has three constituent parts. We have manas, sometimes rendered in English as ‘mind’, though this can be misleading. The manas is that part of inner or more subtle (relative to the sense and action powers) awareness that also looks out, and which links the input and experience of our sense and action powers to our inner realm. We also have ahaṁkāra. Aham means ‘I’, ‘me’. Kāra means ‘maker/doer’. Ahaṁkāra is that part of our awareness that gives us a sense of I, me, mine, of individuality. It is essential to help us safely cross the busy road, to not step into the void when walking along a cliff. Sometimes people use the word ‘ego’ to represent ahaṁkāra, but this can also be misleading. Ahaṁkāra is not an exact equivalent of the Jungian ego. There is some overlap, but it is more than that. Ahaṁkāra is also the intelligence that holds us together as an individual unit.
Here we are, as human beings, made of earth, water, fire, air and space. These elements don’t sit together so easily. If we pour water that contains earthy matter into a glass, before long they separate. If we add fire to that mixture of earth and water, likely the water may boil and evaporate, or the fire will be doused. Yet we humans cohere as this miraculous being with mutually co-existing earthy and watery and fiery parts. In our body that is predominantly water, our internal combustion engine and digestive fire generally functions very well. We are miraculous beings.
The intelligence of our ahaṁkāra is mind-blowing. It functions in ways that certainly go well beyond what we are able to compute with our minds. It also demonstrates that we have, innate within us, a great capacity for yoga, for togetherness, for reconciling that which might at first glance seem impossible to reconcile.

Buddhi - Home of discernment, key for integration
The third part of our antaḥ karaṇa - the internal instrument of our conscious awareness, is known in Sanskṛt as buddhi. This is the subtler part of our intelligence. It is this subtle power of buddhi that discerns, that makes decisions. Buddhi is the realm of discriminating, judicious awareness, the seat of our subtler capacities that help us relate to others, that enables us to hold differing points of view, to empathise, to reflect and contemplate. Buddhi is from the same Sanskṛt root ‘bodh’ that gives us the word Buddha - the awakened one. Sometimes referred to as the enlightened one.
When the light of awareness is circulating smoothly and harmoniously through the circuit of our being, through all our gaṇa-s - all the members of the gang of our whole self - we can see and experience more clearly. When the light of intelligence and awareness courses freely through the network of our tattva-s, through the whole of our neural network, we can act and respond more intelligently. When our circuit is earthed, when we are steady, easeful, spacious, balanced, integrated, we can act more skilfully, respond to unexpected and even intimidating situations with more clarity and discernment.
Yoga practice is about training this capacity to respond skilfully.

Ancient and ever fresh - perennial yogic wisdom
The other day I was talking with a friend who is a psychologist and psychotherapist about the challenges of responding skilfully in our world of uncertainty. She shared with me one of the brilliant ways contemporary neuroscientist Dr Dan Siegel describes the brain, using the forearm and hand to illustrate what he refers to as ‘the hand model of the (head) brain’. I was struck by how Dr Siegel’s perspective and work echoes the findings and teachings of the ancient research scientists of the Indian tradition. Indeed, the modern neuroscientific descriptions of the brain map well onto the model of the tattva-s, and can help us understand some of the broader meaning of ahaṁkāra and buddhi that reach beyond the English words that are sometimes used to represent them.

The hand model of the brain
(I have linked to three talks of Dr Dan Siegel explaining this at the foot of the article - below is my paraphrasing him and linking it to the yogic model of the antaḥ karaṇa)
Taking our forearm and hand, and looking at them perpendicular to the ground: from the elbow to the wrist is like our spinal column, the central information highway through which our ‘brain’ and intelligences are spread through the whole of our body, animating our sense and action capacities. The base of the palm is then like the brain stem, continuous with the spinal chord and responsible for breathing and other autonomic fuctions. This is the oldest part of our brain, (around 300million years say contemporary neuroscientists) sometimes called the reptilian brain, and it’s also the seat of the flight, fight, freeze and feint responses. If we then fold in our thumb across our palm, the area of the mid-palm enclosed by the thumb can give us a representation that also includes the next part of our brain, the limbic system, also referred to as the mammalian brain (about 200million years old). This is the seat of our basic motivational drives and the part that allows us to feel attachment to our mother and close associates.
If we then fold down our four fingers, the fingers represent the more recent part of the brain, the cortex. This part of the brain is what allows our higher linguistic capacities and our capacities, for example, to empathise and to hold, honour, acknowledge and even reconcile different perspectives and points of view.
We have these capacities, but we do not always stay attuned to them. Dr Siegel represents this by the memorable image of lifting up the previously folded down fingers. To quote him, this is like we have ‘flipped our lid’, which can happen easily when for example we become fearful, anxious, angry or dejected. The integrating, connective part of the brain in the pre-frontal cortex which when integrated connects the powers of the cortex, the limbic system, brainstem and body gets ‘disconnected’. Dr Siegel explains how we then become either ‘chaotic’, with outbursts of irrationality or reactivity for example; or ‘rigid’, shut down and withdrawn. In other words, we lose our connection to our ‘higher’/subtler capacities. We lose our connection to buddhi. In this disintegrated state, in most situations, we can no longer act optimally - running for our lives being an exception.

We flip our lid, we lose integration, we lose balance - and we disconnect from our capacity for a skilful response.

As my friend related Dr Siegel’s ‘handy’, ever-ready model of the head brain, and how the disintegration of the subtler parts of our awareness can happen so easily when we feel dominated by fear, anger or more primitive urges, I was struck by how it echoes what Kṛṣṇa, the teacher, lays out so memorably in the Bhagavad Gītā.

The story of human suffering - in 64 syllables
In 64 syllables, Kṛṣṇa distils the whole history of human suffering:
Dhyāyato viṣayān puṁsaḥ saṅgasteṣūpajāyate
Saṅgāt sañjāyate kāmaḥ kāmāt krodho’bhijāyate
Krodhāt bhavati sammohaḥ sammohāt smṛtivibhramaḥ
Smṛti bhramśād buddhināśaḥ buddhināśātpraṇaśyati BGII.62-63

When we humans dwell and focus on things, we become attached to them.
But this attachment does not emerge without its confederates/associates/the fellows of its litter.
From attachment is also born desire, from desire anger - in the broadest sense of perturbation/anxiety/frustration as well as rage - and from anger comes confusion. From confusion, we forget the lessons we have already learnt, our accrued wisdom and discernment is as lost. We lose our ‘connection’ to our buddhi - to the subtlest capacities of our intelligence. When we fall into this cyclic trap of our perturbation/disturbance at our expectations not being met, when our judgment is clouded by anger, envy, anxiety, panic, fear, when we lose connection to our higher capacities, we are lost.

When we lose our connection to buddhi, when we are no longer buddhiyuktaḥ, or integrated: when the light of awareness is no longer illuminating all parts of ourself, we are lost! Running for our lives scenarios aside, if we regress to the level of a frightened mammal, or a cold blooded reptile, we abdicate our true capacities, we lose our humanity, we act ‘beneath’ our true selves. Perhaps you have experienced this a few times in your life, in your own behaviour or in that of others around you. For example, I do not have to make too much effort to recall situations where I acted in ways that did not serve me, or others, and that engendered needless suffering, because I acted not from integration and clear, balanced, integrated intelligence and awareness, but from a fearful, wounded or more primitive place.

To return to Dan Siegel’s memorable phrase to describe our losing our integration and connectedness to our higher, subtler, more complete intelligence: when we ‘flip our lid’, we are no longer as integrated a human being as we already can be, and we are no longer able to draw on the true range of our already activated human capacities. As Kṛṣṇa says, when we lose our connection to buddhi we are lost. When our awareness is clouded and shrouded by anger, anxiety, fear or dejection, we lose connection with our accrued wisdom. We forget the lessons we thought we had already learnt! When this happens it’s a bit like we are bungling and stumbling along back in some prehistoric dark age before we developed a cortex, before we became fully human. But to stay fully human requires effort, and presence. It requires integration. Now perhaps more than ever.
I understand that a century or so ago Rudolf Steiner and Nikola Tesla both spoke about how it was becoming increasingly difficult to be fully human because of the ever-increasing pollution through the elements of existence. Steiner suggested that in order to be human, one would need to redouble the efforts of spiritual practice: of practices that help ‘join us up’ and connect the circuits of our being. One of my Indian teachers more recently said a similar thing:
‘These days the traditional techniques don’t work as they used to, because of the increased pollution in all the elements, so we need to include in our practices regular work to keep cleansing and harmonising the elements of our being. Natural frequencies that previously used to prevail easily once established are now under assault not just from the pollutants in the earth, water, and air, but since the industrial revolution in the element of fire and the realm of kinetic energy, and in the very space we inhabit in the form of all the microwaves and radiation that some of our modern technologies are bombarding our ecosphere with.’
…
So what to do? We cultivate the medi-state. With patience and with kindness, with loving presence, we invite all parts of ourselves into the present moment. We practice reinforcing our connectivity, deepening our attunement to our capacity for integration.
As soon as we notice we have become less integrated, or we are not fostering the depth of integration we could, we are empowered. Once we notice, we can do something about it: invite ourselves back into a more gathered, integrated, connected state.
While some external factors may have changed over the centuries, the basic practice of cultivating the medistate, practising gathering ourselves into congruence, tuning the instruments of our being and inviting a state of at-one-ment is perennially valid and helpful. When we are centred, balanced, integrated, we can meet the challenges of life more skilfully.
Further, as the yoga teachings remind us, challenges are really opportunities, and we will never have to encounter anything we are not really ready for. Unexpected challenges are what we have really been preparing for, opportunities to uncover more of who we really are, and recover more of our true capacities. In the Gītā, Kṛṣṇa tells his student Arjuna that the ‘great challenge’ he faces, the situation that renders obsolete the codes and rules he has previously lived by is his ‘lucky day’! What he has been waiting for and preparing for his whole life. Yoga practice is about looking in ways that reach beyond our habitual ways of looking. It’s about thinking in ways vaster than we might previously have dared dream. Challenges that shake our status quo make it harder for us to ignore the whisperings that ‘there may be more to this life’ than I have previously granted space in my attention for. When we consistently cultivate steadiness, we fortify ourselves to be able to navigate the predictably unpredictable reality of life that little bit more effectively. When we consistently practice inviting all of ourself into the present moment, we become more attuned to the medistate of integration and wholeness. More attuned to this space of balance, we notice more readily when, how and in what type of situations we allow ourselves to become disconnected. Once we notice, we are empowered to do something about it. As one of my Indian teachers says: ‘Remember, your problem is smaller than you are! It exists in your awareness.’ When we notice, we are empowered. And we notice more, and more easily when we are connected. So let us maintain awareness of our ‘lid’! Let us embody sovereign responsibility for the congruence of all the miraculous constituent elements of our being. Let us work to foster a more robust, resilient and responsive buddhiyuktaḥ state: attuned to conscience and connected to the true depth and breadth of our human resources.
...
Dr Dan Siegel’s hand model of the brain: Three video links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-m2YcdMdFw

Compassion in education TEDx
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-BJpvdBBp4

Mindfulness and neural education TEDx talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiyaSr5aeho

1 Comment

Bhagavad Gītā Chapter Three at MCY April 2020 Session Notes One

4/4/2020

1 Comment

This season, my live teaching engagements are cancelled/suspended for the time being. I'm feeling very grateful for the chance to continue sharing some programs online. This month a course on Chapter Three of the Bhagavad Gītā at MCY, Glasgow. I thought it could be nice to share my session notes here.

March 3rd - Session One (March 2nd) Summary

Tellingly, the third chapter begins with a question. Kṛṣṇa has given the distillation of the whole teaching in chapter two. As the elaboration and expansion of that teaching begins, it does so from a question, reminding us that yoga is about inquiry. It is not incidental or accidental that the Gītā is a conversation. It is in conversation with life, in dialogue with the constant change and unfolding wonder of existence that we make ourselves available to learn and grow, and to take/claim/allow our place in the greater unfolding and evolution of life.

Yoga does not give us ‘the answer’ in the sense of a one-size fits all/catch-all solution. Based on the observation of nature, it is far too wise, realistic and practical for that. Instead, it encourages us to stay open, alert and present. Yoga gives us a robust frame and structure to support ongoing inquiry, to help us keep engaging in conversation with life so we can ask skilful, helpful questions, so we can make ourselves available for the ‘hints’/guidance/answers that life and nature are constantly offering.
In the first two verses, the manner of Arjuna’s question also reminds us of the purity of his intent. In the Gītā, Arjuna represents the human being who is a sincere seeker. He addresses Kṛṣṇa by two significant epithets: Janārdana - exciter/stimulator/agitator/protector of humans; and Keśava - the one who holds/sustains/supports existence/creation.
‘Why Kṛṣṇa - you who know what it means to support the whole of life, you who stimulate/animate human beings, you’ve spoken about how I need to become oceanic: full, content, whole like the ocean (2.70), you’ve said that if I can move freely through the things of the world without being pulled hither and thither, then I’ll be established in yoga, you’ve said that if I can just get a taste of totality, I can access the desireless state of oneness/wholeness. If this state of clear awareness, of clear wisdom and insight that can see beyond and through all the comings and goings of life is so great - if wisdom and clear awareness is where it’s really at, why are you urging me to this terrible action?
‘As you emphasise the imperative of action and engagement, and the primacy of clear, discerning awareness and peaceful wisdom, it’s as if your words point in different directions, urge me in different ways. It’s too much for my intellect! It makes me feel confused, consternated! Please Kṛṣṇa, tell me that one, clear way by which I can do what is truly śreyaḥ - what is for the good of all. Make it clear for me, unambiguous, so I can obtain/come to śreyaḥ - the highest good!’

Arjuna’s question points to many ‘answers’. Here again is encoded and emphasised a key idea that we find throughout the Gītā. If our attitude is one of openness, of gratitude, and of inquiry, teachings and insights will come to us. The Guru of Nature is ever active. Our task is to make ourselves receptive. When Arjuna calls Kṛṣṇa Janārdana (stimulator) and Keśava (holder) the verse reminds us that in order to maintain and support the evolution of life, we have to be active. We have to engage and participate. Arjuna also acknowledges that ‘the way’ Kṛṣṇa has set forth so far is too much for his intellect. And it is! We cannot come to yoga by merely reading or hearing about it! That can usher us towards it, can invite us towards deeper recognitions. However, in the practical tradition of yoga, practice and study are never separate, but are two wings of one bird. Yoga - integration of the whole field of ourselves - is too much for our mere intellect to grasp. It is only when we practice it, experientially, allying the discerning power of our intellect to the harnessed energy and intelligence of our bodies, senses, minds and emotions that we will be able to come to a true understanding - will be able to stand in that recognition/have that awareness under our feet, supporting how we walk through the mystery and wonder of life.

Arjuna’s question also reminds us how in yoga we will encounter paradox. We will encounter seeming pairs of opposites. Yoga is an all-inclusive game. If we want unity, we cannot leave anything out. In other words, yoga is about the resolution of paradox, about reconciling that which seems impossible to reconcile, about coming to the embodied, experiential lived recognition and understanding that things which seem opposed can actually be mutually enhancing and complementary, and can be included and brought together into a state of dymanic balance and harmony.
Arjuna’s question also reverberates with ‘humanness’. He, like us so often, wants an easy way, a clear, unequivocal answer. On the one hand, we want it to be easy - at least we say we do - yet our appetite for drama and our capacity for complexity suggests that really we may be better equipped for this resolution of paradox than we may sometimes give ourselves credit for, or remember/recognise.

Kṛṣṇa responds by addressing Arjuna as Anagha - one free from blame. Beautifully then he reassures us that such doubting, such confusion, is no cause for us to be weighed down, or to castigate ourselves. And he says:
‘In this world - of duality, but which is not binary, but a realm of nuance and infinite perspectives and permutations - from the beginning/from time immemorial/always/perennially I have taught/proclaimed this teaching (of Sāṅkhya-Yoga) from two positions: with the yoga of knowledge for those of more intellectual/reflective/theoretical persuasion; and with the yoga of action for those of more practical/active/social persuasion.’
Notably though, the way of karmayoga and jñānayoga are both yoga! From either position/orientation, it is still yogena - by yoga - that one practices/proceeds.
We also mentioned that though Kṛṣṇa is saying that the teaching is always given/can always be taken from two positions, he is not saying there are two teachings or two paths. Rather, the one path of yoga, which by its very nature is inclusive, can be approached from different perspectives. Yoga is practical, so we approach in a way that works for us. Ultimately though, and even immediately, our own unique ‘stream’ in the great river of practice will have to flow along in a way that includes all parts of ourself. Otherwise, we will keep getting stuck in the same old eddies, or going around in circles in an oxbow lake, even when so much of ourself is ready to stream on towards the broader, wider - more inclusive - flowing river that leads to the ocean of totality.

We mentioned that while the path of yoga is really one vast, inclusive path, there are many approaches. Sometimes people speak of five yoga-s, corresponding to the five elements:
Everything grows from the roots. As Kṛṣṇa begins to lay out the vast, inclusive way of yoga, he starts at the foundation, with karma yoga, the yoga of action, action that we never stand separate from.
Earth - pṛthvī - karma yoga
Water - jala - bhakti yoga
Fire - agni/tejas - haṭha yoga
Wind/Air - Vāyu - jñāna yoga
Space/Ether - rāja yoga

All the elements are in us. If we are to come to yoga, to a state of togetherness/all-one-ness, then we cannot leave anything out.
The yoga practitioner is always taught to work from gross to subtle. Whichever aspect of yoga we begin with, as we explore from gross to subtle, it brings us into the other aspects. For example, if we are practising the royal (rāja) yoga of meditation (as encoded in Patañjali’s yoga sūtra and in the Gītā), as we explore the medi-state, we see how the ways we act (karma), the ways we relate to and approach (bhakti) existence, the tenor of our emotional life, the way we relate to and honour the gifts of our pulsating bodily vehicle that is a sacred microcosmic manifestation of the universe (haṭha), and the way we honour the gifts of our discernment, intelligences and self-reflexive awareness (jñāna) are all totally and intrinsically entwined with our meditation practice. As has sometimes been said, how we do one thing is how we do everything. If we are practising meditation/yoga, we cannot leave anything out. Of course, some may take greater recourse to emotional or bodily practices, some may orient more through study and the intellect, but yoga requires us to honour, nourish, include all parts of ourself, all the elements of our being.

In the fourth verse, Kṛṣṇa makes it clear that:
‘It is not by not entering into action that a person becomes free from (the binding influence of) action/karma. Sitting on the sidelines of life is not an option. That is not the way to become free. That is not the way to be free to enjoy and experience the moment without being weighed down by its residual impressions. Nor is renunciation the mere external/surface renunciation or giving up of/desisting from action.’

To illustrate, we considered the story of the two ‘renunciate’ monks whose vows included celibacy and avoiding physical contact with others. On their way back to their monastery through the forest they come to a river, with the water quite high, the current strong. At the river bank is a gorgeous young woman. The younger monk shrinks back, keeping his distance, summoning the inner demoniacal tyrant of his suppressive willpower to avert his eyes from the perturbingly enchanting flame of her vivid beauty… The older monk walks up to her, straight, polite. It’s obvious she needs to cross the water, and is afraid for her safety. Without hesitation, with a warm smile grounded in kindness and compassion, the older monk picks up the young maiden in his arms and wades skilfully across the river. His younger brother monk follows in their wake, at a ‘safe distance’.
Crossed the river, the older monk lowers the woman’s feet to the Earth and gives her his blessing for a safe journey onwards back to her village. He then continues on, not speaking, for these monks also observe a vow of silence in the morning hours. It is peaceful in the forest, and there is a rich, gentle music of birdsong. From his years of assiduous practice, the older monk’s internal awareness is a realm of deep, spacious quiet. He is able to enjoy the sounds of the forest, yet he is also able to discern something of the noisy torment haranguing the mind of his young companion.
Later in the afternoon, the two monks reach the forest hermitage of their master, and go to see him to report on their excursion. The master asks them if there was any incident of note on their return journey.
‘No’, says the senior monk.
The younger monk’s eyes bulge and he glances askance at his senior.
‘You disagree?’ inquires the master.
‘Well, I do, yes, I would say that breaking our vows of silence and celibacy is something of incident!’
The older monk smiles:
‘Brother, I carried the young woman across the river. Once we had crossed over and she felt safe to continue her way home. I set her down… You have been carrying her in your mind ever since.’
And the master and the older monk smile kindly at the younger one.

This story illustrates powerfully what Kṛṣṇa emphasises here, that it is not by mere external renunciation that one renounces, that it is not by not entering into action that one becomes free of the binding influence of action.

The contrast of the two monks also serves powerfully to illustrate ‘the way’ of yoga. As they walk through the forest, beauty is all around, then comes a type of beauty that the younger one has ‘ideas’ around, ‘that it is dangerous or forbidden’, and his ideas get in the way of his humanity, stop him from helping another human being. He, young and hale, denies the gift of his youthful strength, denies his conscience that would urge him to be of help, and shrinks back, looking on in disapproval as his older companion uses his strength to carry the young woman across the torrent. The young monk is paralysed by his belief system. The ‘code’ that he lives by, and which ordinarily, in the monastery, may serve him fine, is not adaptable or robust enough for the extraordinary reality of the wild forest of Life! His reaction shows how attachment to ideas and prejudices can bind and blind us, ensnare us, imprison us.

Beautifully, the example of his more mature companion demonstrates the nuanced, adaptable, robust and inclusive way of yoga. More seasoned, he knows that rules sometimes have to be broken, sometimes must be broken, to respect the deeper principles they are designed to enshrine. He does not hesitate or shrink back from life. In the quiet spaciousness of his awareness, he has room to respond, rather than react from a conditioned, fearful place. And so he is free to heed his conscience, to bring forth the gift of his empathic humanity. Simply, generously, honouring the gift of his strength and awareness, he picks the woman up and carries her across the water.

In symbolic teaching stories, or archetypal stories like this, I often find it helpful to consider the different characters as aspects of ourself, or of a single psyche.
The gentle smiles of the older monk and the master in response to the younger monk’s consternation also demonstrate ‘the way’ of yoga, and how we can gradually free ourselves of the burden of the binding influence of action. They smile. Gently, warmly, they invite the younger one - less seasoned, less spacious, more reactive - to his own recognition. When he ‘spits out’ his disapproval, he is able to see it, and then see that it perhaps has a deeper source: his own perturbation at feeling blocked in relation to the light of his own conscience, his own anger at himself for being a slave to rules and fear, when something deeper in him knows all the while he can walk gracefully, like his older brother has shown him… He is invited to come to his own, deeper, owned recognition that it is not really so much about what he does, but what is the quality of his motivation; not so much about what he does but more about how he does it, how he meets the extraordinary and the unexpected gifts/opportunities that one may encounter along the forest path of life.

In the fifth verse, Kṛṣṇa further emphasises the inevitability of action;
‘No one - no one, no exceptions! - stands outside of action even for a moment! No one is ever, even for a moment able to stand as a ‘non-doer of action’. Everyone, all of us, each one of us, is always and constantly forced/obliged to act by the guṇa-s born of Prakṛti/Nature. This is beyond our will or control!’
Everything in existence, in prakṛti, the realm of nature, is active. Nature is the realm of birth, death and change. Manifest existence is woven with the three threads of the guṇa-s:
Sattva, rajas, and tamas.
Sattva - the pure, essential existence of a thing
Rajas - its dynamism, its being subject to change
Tamas - its inertia, and its eventual decay

We are creatures of Nature. We are nature. Born, we will die, and between those two great changes, we will be subject to constant change. Activity will be a constant. Action is inevitable. Kṛṣṇa has already made it clear. Yoga is a practical way. If something is inevitable, then do it the best you can. Your nature is to act, so act well! Harness the gifts of your integrated awareness so you can make your actions worship. Bring the harmonised powers of your body, senses, mind and emotions together, so you can live life as a beautiful movement, so you can honour and celebrate the gifts of life. Work with the reality of your own nature to realise your deeper essence.

1 Comment

YOGA and SPORT part two

2/11/2020

0 Comments

Yoga and Sport part two - The sport of yoga

Recreation, sport, competition and competence

Competition, as it is often understood these days, could be seen to go against yoga.
By definition, yoga is all inclusive. It leaves nothing out. Yoga cannot leave anything out, because it is about connecting and integrating all the parts. It is about unity in the middle of our world of so many dualities. And unity can be real and sustainable only if it is genuinely inclusive.

In recent times, as I write, one has not needed to look far to see the ugly face of competition in the sporting arena: a win at all costs attitude, sports ‘cultures’ full of abuse and corruption. Yet still, one can also see examples of the sense of companionship and respect that can come from competition/competitive endeavour, and the way that honest, respectful competitiveness between well-matched rivals can help everyone grow. When competitors play fairly, they can spur each other on and drive each other to growth: the competitive arena can become a place where everyone is edified.

When competitive sport is such, everyone is a winner. Each participant is complicit in the growth and ‘going beyond’ of the others. When we compete, seek and strive together honestly and openly, our competence grows, and our understanding of ourself grows.

And really, this is what competition means. Etymologically:
Verb - Compete, from com – together and petere – to seek together
Noun – competition, strife of rivals towards a common goal

And: Competence – the ability to work towards a goal

Considering the root meaning of the word then, we could say that competition means to work together towards an aspiration, towards something all parties working together yearn for. And competence is our ability to do this.

This sounds a lot like using a technique, or a support (an ālambana in the Sanskṛt yogic terminology), as the means to invite all our constituent powers into the experience of working together so that we can feel a real satisfaction.
Yoga practice is about developing, remembering, and reclaiming this innate competence.
As such, we might say that yoga is a ‘competitive sport’: not in the sense of a game with winners and losers, but as a re-creational game, in which every participant can be a ‘winner’. It is the play, or the game, of inviting all our constituent powers to work together so they may access and reveal their deeper longing.

Nowhere to go, nothing to do
Of course, there are those who say: No, no, no, no! There is nothing to do, there is nowhere to go, you are already it! And they may be right, but most times when I hear this, I feel ‘the lady doth protest too much’, and I am not convinced.

It may well be true that I am already all that I seek. However, if my current habits, patterns and ways of thinking, seeing and holding myself continually remind me that I am not quite satisfied, that I’m not quite playing the game of life as skilfully as I might, that I am not drinking from life’s rich cup as deeply as I might, then by Thunder I’d better do something about it!

If I do nothing, then I know what happens: I drop into depressed apathy, or I notice I have all this angst, this pain, this grief and desire that propels me to do. Or, more basically, I need to defecate, I need to feed myself, because as Kṛṣṇa reminds us so beautifully and powerfully in the Gītā: doing nothing is just not an option for a human being. The ‘choice’ to do nothing is itself an action, a ‘karma’, and it will have consequences. As a human, we are a living, breathing, moving agent: action is our nature, and we cannot avoid it. The mere sustenance of our life demands action. Yoga, the practical school of Indian Philosophy, holds no truck with the armchair intellectualiser theorising about his true nature, but exhorts us to be all we really are and demonstrate it in the way we conduct our lives.

Action is inevitable, the question then is how? How do I do it, this thing called life? How do I make it? How do I play it?

Make it a sport, make it a game, make it a play, make it a recreation.
Take it easily, but seriously.
Get in the game, be here, now! But know, remember, it is a game.
Not inhibited by concern about the result, just allow myself to enjoy the experience.
Freeing ourselves from the weight of past impressions and the anxieties over future outcomes by engaging fully with this moment, the ‘actionless action’, the ‘effortless effort’, the skilful means, the karma yoga, the action that is its own reward becomes our reality.

This yoga is a game worth playing.

Playing like this, I am no longer concerned by winning or losing. Inhabiting the moment like this, so fully, so whole-system nourishingly, is its own victory, its own triumph, its own reward.

0 Comments

On the history of yoga āsana

2/10/2020

0 Comments

An image of Śiva, Yogīśvara, who traditionally is recognised as the source of yoga āsana and haṭha yoga methodologies. I am not sure whose artwork this is, if anyone knows please tell me so I can credit it. This picture was sent to me by a friend in an email one time

On the History of Āsana

A few years ago was published a book advancing a very narrow and very particular thesis on the ‘origins’ of physical yoga practice and modern āsana. In this book, the author suggests that the postures and practices of what is sometimes referred to as modern yogāsana are just adaptations of British gymnastics and an outgrowth of the desire in late 19th/early 20th century India to reaffirm a culture of physical strength after the centuries of oppression under foreign invaders. Certainly, these factors may of course have had some significant influence on the spread and development of modern, body-based yoga practices. However, I find the idea that they are main sources for physical yoga unconvincing and disrespectful. One of the principal ways the author who advanced this thesis likes to supposedly ‘justify’ or ‘substantiate’ his ideas is by inserting the name of some other published academic in brackets, as if their work is undeniable, thoroughly substantiated ‘Gospel truth’, which it often isn’t. As well as most pages being peppered with other academics’ names in parentheses, another outstanding feature of the book is what it leaves completely absent. The author completely avoids/ignores/discounts the traditional view of the origin of yogāsana and other related physical practices in the Indian tradition.

With the complete dismissal of any Indian physical culture before the 19th century, it’s almost as if the author thinks that nobody had ever moved, or danced, in India before they got sick to the back teeth with the British. And further, as if in ancient India: a civilisation of great learning, of depth, beauty and thorough consideration of the whole human being; there was no culture of physical artfulness, no methods of dance, movement or martial arts to help people inhabit the gift of a body more easily.

Such an idea just does not make sense.

However, not only is it nonsensical, I would say it also smacks of an astounding arrogance that can be seen on the part of some ‘Western’ commentators on the Indian tradition: “Oh the Indians, these brown people, couldn’t possibly have developed such a refined and well thought out system of physical health, could they?” Couldn’t they? Again, this view makes no sense. What it does do though is perpetuate the distorting legacy and blinkered perspective that seems to have infected the Western academy going back to the days of the 19th century. At that time, Europeans had started to ‘discover’ some of the treasures of the Indian tradition. This included Sanskṛt, with its oceans of extant literature in so many fields of human knowledge, with a grammar far more sophisticated and a literature much more extensive than the Greek and the Latin. The Sanskṛt linguistics went way beyond anything any European scholar had even dreamed of at the time. But the 19th century Europeans just couldn’t swallow, accept, or admit - or perhaps they were so blinkered by their conditioning that they just weren’t able to see - that these brown people had developed a culture in some ways so much richer than theirs. That while their European ancestors had been stuck in the Dark Ages, these Indians had been pushing the frontiers of human understanding for millennia and enjoying a civilisation far more advanced than had ever been glimpsed in the Europe of the time. The 19th century ‘scholars’ did notice however, so many cognates in the Sanskṛt, Greek and Latin. So, in order to explain how Greek, Latin and Sanskṛt had so much in common, the European ‘discoverers’ made an invention. Rather than honestly consider the vastly abundant evidence in front of them, in the form of a truly amazing Sanskṛt and proto-Sanskṛt Vedic literature, the Europeans concocted the idea of an ‘Indo-European root language’, a language for which there was no material evidence. But no matter, that suited their arrogant, blinkered, falsely superior perspective much better than allowing for the possibility that Sanskṛt, a language developed by the peoples of this ‘primitive’ land that they had colonised and pillaged for its vast riches, was perhaps actually the source language. To the chagrin of many contemporary Sanskritists in India, this concocted theory of an ‘Indo-European root language’ is still prevalent and widely accepted today, even though there is still no evidence of such a language that is not Sanskṛt or its earlier Vedic forms.
There is however, plentiful textual evidence to suggest that the civilization in India in the 1500 years both before and after Christ was, in many ways, significantly more advanced than in Europe. There is also plentiful evidence that some Western commentators are not aware how veiled by their cultural conditionings their ‘readings’ of Indian culture are.

Any of my Sanskṛt teachers who were aware of this book were quite horrified and disgusted by it. In particular, by the way it seems to discount the Indian reality of yoga, that Yoga is a central, intrinsic part of the Indian tradition: Vedic, Tantric, Orthodox, Hetorodox, Yoga is there. I would say too that yoga is also part of a global tradition, with many of its core principles evidenced in wisdom traditions from around the world. Still, Yoga is Indian, Yoga is a Sansḳrt word, and a system of classical Indian Philosophy. Yoga as it has come to us in the 21st century has been most thoroughly developed in the traditions of India: a holistic, practical philosophical tradition that deals with the broad spectrum reality of human existence, including our physicality and physical health.

Here is an alternative view on the history of yoga āsana.

The Lord of Yoga is Śiva. Śiva is represented in many ways. As Yogīśvara, he is usually sitting in a radiant example of a steady, easy classic yogāsana such as siddhāsana or padmāsana. His spine is tall, spacious, erect. His aspect serene as he sits on a tiger skin atop a Himālayan peak. The seat on the tiger’s skin demonstrates his mastery over the tremendous powers of incarnation, of his physicality and sensuality, to the degree that he is steadily established in the ‘abode of snow’: the place of clear, pure, pristine, impartial awareness. His clothing is mere ash, reminding us that having fully harnessed the gifts of life consciousness, he is attuned to the essence - to the remainder which abides and which underlies all the material that comes and goes. His adornment is the king cobra, showing us that in the clarity, impartiality and purity of his awareness, the beguiling beauty of nature is his enjoyment, his companion, his friend; it is no danger, poison or snare for him.

In his jaṭa, his locks dreaded by the fusion of the hemispheres of his brain - the joining in yoga of his analytical and intuitive capacities, he holds Gaṅgā, the vivifying river of concious potential, so she can flow smoothly, gently, easily, to nourish the whole field of consciousness, the whole body of life.

In this form, Śiva Yogīśvara can be seen to represent dynamism in stillness. Another way Śiva is represented is as Nāṭarāja, stillness in dynamism. Nāṭarāja is the Lord of the Dance, the five act dance-drama of Creation: the expansion of consciousness, the sowing of life, sṛṣṭi in Sanskṛt; of sthithi, the sustenance of existence, holding the galaxies in their dance; of samāhāra, the drawing back in to its source of the universe; of tirodhana bhāva, of the concealing or veiling of the real deeper nature of existence and consciousness; and of anugraha, grace, or the revelation and remembering of who we really are.

As Nāṭarāja, Śiva is shown as a slender-waisted, androgynously beautiful and graceful dancer. He is four-armed. In one hand he holds the damaru, the twin-headed drum that symbolises the beat, the rhythm, the pulsation of life, the sound of the creation of existence: sṛṣṭi. Another hand is in abhaya mudra, the gesture signifying ‘have no fear’ - sustenance/sthiti. The third hand wields fire, the circle of flames, symbolising the ever-turning, ever-changing wheel of existence, the circle of life, in which he is constantly dancing. The fourth arm makes the shape of an elephant’s trunk. This symbolises the unifying power of yoga as incarnated by Śiva’s elephant-headed son Gaṇeśa. The fourth hand is pointing to the junction point of Nāṭarāja’s lifted, bent knee. This reminds us that it is through yoga, through gathering and harmonising all the members of the group of our being that we can re-member our true selves. Nāṭarāja’s standing foot is on top of a dwarf called Apasmara - forgetfulness. When we reconcile all of who we really are, when we incarnate the integrated Gaṇeśa energy that is our innate potential, we can remember ourselves. We too can come into rhythm, so we can stay steady and balanced, attuned to our constant, conscious essence, amidst the whirling wonder of life.

Śiva Nāṭarāja is also depicted with the locks of his jaṭa flying out horizontally: for the worlds whirl so quickly, he dances so quickly, yet he is serene, graceful, poised and in rhythm.

Sometimes at temples dedicated to Śiva Nāṭarāja, there are sculptures or depictions of the 108 kāraṇa-s of Śiva as the great dancer, the 108 ‘instrumental positions’ that can be deployed to invite a deepening of yoga in our systems.

These postures are graceful, often curved. They include spinal extension and flexion (backward and forward bends), rotations, side bends and various combinations thereof. They move the limbs and orient the physical structure in space so as to activate the innate haṭha technology of our pulsating bodies. Ha is the sun, the solar channel, heating and contracting; ṭha is the moon, the lunar channel, cooling and relaxing. Life is pulsation, a breath cycle, a heart beat. But these are not the only ways in which our miraculous bodies pulsate. For example, if while standing we lift our right leg upwards in front of us, the front of the leg contracts, ha, while the back lengthens and relaxes, ṭha. Just by the way we move and orient ourselves in space we can influence profoundly the way energy and information pulsates and flows in and through our systems.

Traditionally, within the Yoga Tradition, Śiva himself, Yogīśvara, the Lord or Master of yogi-s, Nāṭarāja, the greatest dancer, is said to have bequeathed yogāsana to human beings. Śiva of course also means the kind, benevolent one. And Śiva means consciousness, the container in which all the śakti - the power of consciousness to become manifest as nature for example - exists.

The yogāsana, like all yoga techniques and teachings, are all based on the observation of nature. It is a fruit of the application of consciousness in focused inquiry. This, as far as I can see, is the real origin of yogāsana.

It was not the British colonisers or the American branders who recognised that the way we move our body can have profound impacts on our overall experience and awareness. This is something people have known since the beginning of time.

The 108 kāraṇa-s of Śiva Nāṭarāja, the plentiful evidence in ancient texts of dance and martial arts that harness the innate haṭha capacities of the body are to my mind adequate evidence that India, just like China, has an ancient system of health that includes movement technologies. Indeed, the 108 kāraṇa-s of Nāṭarāja are very akin to many postures in Chinese martial arts and dance. Humans have been harnessing this in-built haṭha technology for millennia. Call it dance, call it haṭha yoga, call it tai chi, chi gung, subtle or internal martial arts, the aim is the same: to harmonise the bodily vehicle and optimise its capacities so that energy can flow in a cohesive, efficient way, so we can more easily stay in rhythm through the ups, downs and tempo changes of life, and we are more empowered to access the subtler dimensions of our conscious potential.

Āsana and haṭha yoga, ‘somatic yoga practice’ is nothing new. The absence of texts with pictures or descriptions of people performing āsana-s, or the dearth on Youtube of footage of people’s ‘morning practice’ from before the Common Era is not evidence that people had no ‘physical’ or body-based practices. After all, these practices are things one does, they are best learned by doing, they are known by the cells and channels of one’s body, not by their descriptions in a book. Physical practices are part of our human heritage. We have a body, it can move in so many ways. It is a storehouse and circuit of energy. The way we move can affect our physical, mental, sensory capacities. The ancients knew this. I feel pretty sure that people have been harnessing and developing the technologies (tantra-s) of haṭha yoga in posture and movement for millennia.

0 Comments

YOGA and SPORT

2/8/2020

0 Comments

Haṭha yoga and sport

It is important to remember that haṭha yoga is not merely a sport.
However, as we shall see, it can perhaps be very helpful to consider yoga as a sport, and sport can help us understand what yoga is and how to work with it effectively.

Etymologically, sport is related to the word ‘disport’, which originally had the sense of ‘to carry’ and to ‘export’ which had the sense it still carries of ‘to carry away’.
Sport then, can be seen as a means of diversion, to ‘export oneself’ from the day-to-day.

Sport, Yoga, escape and remembering

Some people play sports as an escape, a way to ‘lose themselves’ and forget about the stresses and worries of the day. These days, many people experience a similar pleasure when attending a yoga class. Flowing, dynamic, vigourous classes are often particularly appreciated by class-goers for their capacity to invite the participant to forget about work, ‘get out of their head’ and sweat away some of their cares.
Nothing wrong with this, but isn't yoga more than a bit of momentary diversion?
Yes, it is. To illustrate, let us consider how ‘sport’ can become yoga.

If we accept that sport has been invented for the sake of fun, for the sake of enjoyment, for the sake of exporting oneself out of a world of cares, worries and burdens, into one of greater freedom and exhilaration, it is perhaps not surprising that when people really get into a sporting activity it can sometimes allow the person to experience yoga. From a certain perspective, yoga too is also about exporting oneself from a state of being pressed down by worry: weighed down by the burden of the past and inhibited by anxiety about the future. Yoga is about accessing the spaciousness of true presence. Yoga practice is about training ourselves in ways that foster our capacity for greater presence: developing patterns of behaving, interacting and relating that allow us to be more fully present in each unfolding moment. Yoga then is not merely an escape, or a diversion, but a means to be able to be more fully here, present and easeful, in the reality of our lives: to become the player rather than the ball getting whacked about, up and down, and all over the place.

If someone is playing a sport and really gets into it, this can invite a cohesive concentration of the whole system. The person's mental, sensing and physical powers all become oriented towards and focused on the same task, whether it's hitting the ball, coinciding/avoiding/moving in the ways necessary for the particular demands of that sport. When the player really gets into ‘the zone’, into a focused, integrated state, it can bring forth a ‘high’, a state in which perception becomes clearer, finer, subtler, broader, in which our normal capacities are superseded and we flow in a type of symphonic harmony with the broader situation.

This flow is a type of samādhi, yogic integration.

This ‘zone’ is a realm of yogic - integrated cohesive expansive – experience.

Sport can thus be a type of tantra.
Any activity that yokes the powers of mind, sense powers, body, emotions and sense of self can be a tantra.

But yoga is more than just sport – Yoga is more than any of the particular tantra-s, means or technologies which can facilitate an experience or deepening of it.

The way of yoga is a broad and inclusive one. A basic practice is to do whatever we are doing with all of ourselves. When we allow this, we often access more of our innate capacities. As we have mentioned, full engagement in a sporting pursuit can lead to a transcendent state, it can ‘change our mind’, elevate our awareness and alert us to subtler realms and capacities.

The flow state, the zone, certain stages of samādhi or yogic integration: these types of ‘high’, ‘expansive’, ‘cleansing’, ‘refreshing’, ‘revelatory’ and ‘soothing’ experiences can certainly be accessed or experienced through sports.
Indeed, we might even consider that the essence of sport, and the reason that these different games were invented, could actually be the deeper longing of the human to export him or herself from the mundane, boxed-in, confined, quotidian realm to a transcendent, expansive plane of experience. Who knows? Perhaps this is the real root of so many of our games. Perhaps sport, like dance and performance arts, really has its roots in sacred ceremony. Perhaps it is really a somewhat devolved and in some cases corrupted and demeaned form of ancient sacred practice. Perhaps it was really developed out of a deep understanding of our need to draw on and celebrate the powers with which spirit expresses itself and moves through us. Whatever its origins, wholehearted engagement in sport can be a practical, yogic means to remind ourselves of our place in the broader scheme of things, to celebrate Life and reaffirm our connection to all of it.

0 Comments

HAṬHA YOGA TANTRA

2/5/2020

0 Comments

Haṭha Yoga Tantra

Haṭha yoga is a tantra

Tantra and Yoga are classic examples of Sanskṛt words that encode vast oceans of meaning. Tantra and Yoga are huge, vast topics. I find it somewhat tragic how narrow and attenuated a sense of meaning these words evoke for some people these days. I would suggest that we can all benefit from working with tantric principles to invite yoga more fully into our lives.

Simply stated: yoga is balance, integration, harmony. Who does not want more of these?

Yoga is the experience of oneness, of all-one-ness, of all-togetherness, wholeness, in the middle of the constant change and whirling wonder of nature.

Tantra is the ‘technology’: the ’means’ to work with the reality of ever-changing nature and our multifaceted experience of existence so we can experience yoga.

Yoga comes from the root ‘yuj’ which means to connect, to link the various powers of our individual human nature: our emotions, our sensings, our bodies with their motor and sense powers, our minds and intellects; all of these miraculous powers of which we are constituted. The idea in yoga is that we yoke them to the underlying consciousness that enables and animates them all, so we may integrate them into a cohesive whole.

Tantra can be construed in different ways.
One meaning of the verb ‘tan’ is to expand. The noun ‘tanum’ signifies the body, and it connotes the fragility of our human body as a non-stable entity that is always changing and is susceptible the manifold influences of the broader nature of which it is a part.
The verb root ‘trā’ means to protect.
One of the ways tantra can thus be understood is as the means to protect our body-housed individual consciousness from the natural sense of limitation ‘that flesh is heir to’. Given that the body and the body-borne powers that we experience life through are always subject to change, it is altogether normal that we can become identified with change and limitation. Tantra works with the reality of nature and the phenomenological world of pulsating pairs of opposites to foster integration, harmony and help us expand our limited ideas about who we are and what we are made of.

Haṭha yoga is tantra, because it works with spanda, pulsation, a basic tantra concept.
Ha means sun, heating, expanding
ṭha means moon, cooling, contracting
And yoga means balancing, harmonising
So the term haṭha yoga tells us explicitly what yoga is all about: the harmonisation of the apparent pairs of opposites.
Yoga is the balancing of seemingly opposing forces.
First of all, this means that Yoga is about letting the pairs of opposites meet and get acquainted, get to really know and appreciate each other. Yoga is about working with these forces, allowing for the apparent pairs of opposites to become so deeply intimate that they can join in a type of ‘marriage’. With practice and patience, these different forces and capacities can become more thoroughly and beautifully integrated. As integration deepens, the mutually complementary potential of the different and sometimes seemingly opposed forces or polarities within our being emerges more fully. In such a dynamic, integrated state, these different capacities can then readily and seamlessly work to deepen and sustain harmony, even as life, with all its constant change, ups and downs, continues to whirl about us.
This is establishment in yoga.
And this is yoga āsana.
Āsana means ‘seat’. It is defined in the Yoga Sūtra as sthira sukha meaning steady and easy. Yoga āsana is the seat of sustainable, steady, easy awareness: when we sit, stand, experience, established in that integrated state. In a state of yoga āsana, all of our powers are connected and attuned, and illumined by their connection to the light of our conscience.

It is thus ironic that haṭha yoga or āsana practice is sometimes these days being propagated as some limited outlying branch of yoga or a type of ‘partial’ yoga, a merely physical practice, a mat practice, or some kind of fitness option; because haṭha yoga, just like all the other yogas, karma yoga, jñāna yoga, bhakti yoga, rāja yoga for example, is yoga. That is the principle that counts, to connect, to integrate, to ‘yogify’.

So certainly, yes, while many haṭha yoga techniques use the body and the bodily powers more overtly, more grossly and a little more outwardly demonstrably than some other yoga modalities or techniques, if these physical practices are really yoga then these techniques will also invite the powers of our senses, of our minds, intellects and our hearts into the moment, into the movement, into the practice: into the opportunity to train our innate capacity for all-oneness, for togetherness, for wholeness, balance and integration.

There is no such thing as partial yoga.

There is no such thing as ‘just the physical yoga practice’! One can do physical practices that makes use of shapes or forms that are derived from yoga methodologies, or that ‘look like’ yoga. But if the practice we are working with is yoga, then it will always be more than just merely physical, or merely mental, or merely intellectual, or merely emotional, because yoga is about inviting the whole system into the practice.
Yoga is always about inviting the whole system into the present moment. Tantra-s, such as haṭha yoga, are thoroughly tested technologies, or methods, that work with the reality of life, our human condition and constitution, to help train us more deeply in the ways of whole system presence and integration.

0 Comments

YOGA, AUTHENTICITY AND AUTHORITY

1/30/2020

0 Comments

One of the ways that an advanced state of yoga is described is as kaivalya - to stand alone: to be in a state of 'all-one-ness'. Not lonely, but whole and integrated. The more we can establish ourselves in such a place, the easier it is to act authentically, attuned to the guidance of the pilot of our conscience; less impeded, influenced or swayed by the accumulated veilings of our conditioned ideas.

A foundational teaching in yoga - from Kṛṣṇa in the Bhagavad Gītā - is that what we do and how we do it is basically up to us. Our actions are our responsibility. At the same time, we have no control over the outcomes or fruits of our actions. Still, we do know from experience that certain types of action tend to bring ‘bitter fruit’ or ‘barren harvests’. With practice, when we pay closer attention, we may notice that when we act from a place of confused motivation, it tends to bring more confusion; when we act from a place of pain and woundedness, it tends to beget more pain. So, even though we have no control over outcomes, we can still learn from experience and take care to avoid needless suffering. And, we have to act. No one rests outside the field of action even for a moment. The mere maintenance of our bodily existence obliges us to act.

Action is inevitable.
When something is inevitable, the yoga teachings urge us to be with it as skilfully as possible. If something is inevitable, no point getting down about it. That will just reduce our chance of navigating the situation as well as we might. So yoga tells us: whatever comes, meet it as best you can, with steady presence, with the most balance you can muster. As far as possible, meet it with even-sightedness, resisting the tendency to lapse into prejudiced patterns of perception. Set yourself up to engage as skilfully as is possible.

We often have a lot more agency than we allow ourselves to admit.

Yoga reminds us that our life, our experience, is our responsibility.

We never know what life will bring to us, but we can, at least to some degree, determine how we meet it.

Yoga urges us to be the author of our own life. To let our life be an authentic expression of our uniqueness. Yoga urges us to practice authenticity, to live in true, authentic rhythm, respecting the cycles and seasons of life, working with nature, within and around us, to do our dharma, the action that supports lokasaṅgraha, the wellbeing of the whole.

When we practice, we may realise that sometimes, perhaps often, we are not really the author of our own lives, we are not claiming authorship as wholly as we might. Sometimes, we may be a ‘co-author’, our decisions and apparent ‘choices’ being significantly influenced by parental, familial, or societal forces. And sometimes, we may even abdicate authorship altogether, lapsing into autopilot, or a less conscious place, where we are just a minor character in a narrative foisted upon us by the influences and currents of the time: of the people, media, and advertising around us, and by the inertia of our accumulated habits and conditionings.

Yoga reminds us: you are the sovereign of your life. A famous proverb in Sanskṛt states that the sovereign is not shaped by the time, but rather the sovereign shapes the time. Yes, we are each a small speck in the cosmos. We can perhaps only be a co-author, with the larger forces of Nature, life, existence. Nonetheless, when we claim responsibility, when we accept that we are each the captain of the ship in the journey of our own life, we can strengthen our authority and our authenticity.

As we practice living the authentic expression of our soul’s deep calling, we can become more established on the ‘seat’ or ‘āsana’ of yoga: a steady, sustainable, easeful place of self-trust and authentic expression, of authority for our own experience.

And this is part of what Kṛṣṇa in the Bhagavad Gītā teaches us as he explains karma yoga, the yoga of action: the practical way to, as best we can, make all that we do dharma - the action that supports lokasaṅgraha - the wellbeing of the whole: of all parts of ourselves, of all parts of the field of our experience, and beyond.

0 Comments

ECONO-BEE

1/29/2020

0 Comments

ECONO-BEE
On how ecology - the understanding of the ecos: the environment, the resources - is the foundation for economy - good management of the ecos. On learning from other species, especially bees, and pollinators more generally, considered emissaries of the Sun, the Source of Life by the ancient Egyptians, and by me, too. On the bee capsule at Barefeet biofeedback in Samara, Costa Rica. And on the sufficiency economy advocated by the 9th King of the Thai Chakri dynasty.

In my recent article ‘Into the Grey’, I mentioned that when I saw Satish Kumar speak on Soil, Soul and Society, he said many things that have stayed with me in the years since. That day, Satish related how on a previous occasion, he had been invited to speak at the London School of Economics. On taking the dais, Satish asked the audience who was there from the Ecology department.
No one raised their hand.
“We don’t have an Ecology department here Mr Kumar.”
Now I paraphrase Satish’s response:
“Mmm, no Ecology department, in a school of Economics… something’s amiss here, no? Something is not really adding up.
Economia - management of the ecos, of the resources. Ecologia - understanding of those resources.
There can be no economy (good management of the resources) without ecology (understanding of the resources).”
Indeed.

Some politicians and media voices repeat again and again how ‘we need a strong economy’. Sometimes, in what I would say is a spectacularly flawed and fallacious way, they suggest that we need to prioritise ‘the economy’ over all other concerns. Making such assertions, they speak as if ‘economic growth’, or having more and more of this imagined construct called money displayed in figures on a screen, will enable us to have a better life. We are strange creatures us humans. Surely, ecology, and looking after the long-term wellbeing of the environment is a necessary foundation for a functioning and healthy economy. We risk there being no ecos to enjoy if we do not look after it.

This is one of the reasons why I would like to ask that we ‘change the climate’ of our discourse around the environment. I was born in 1977. When I started secondary school, undeniable facts of environmental degradation were already well-known. Deforestation was decimating species, weakening the resilience and adaptability of the overall ecos and biosphere. Industrial and chemical pollution was known to cause all sorts of respiratory problems, diseases and ailments in humans. We knew that chemical pesticides and fertilisers were not viable long-term ways to provide nourishing food. We knew that industrial and chemical pollution was making fresh drinking water scarcer. We knew we were soiling our own nest. In the late 1980s, the ‘green movement’ was ‘on’/‘in trend’, at least that’s how it seemed to me. As I recall it, in England then, the Body Shop, with its high profile campaigns Against Animal Testing and for Recycling, Reducing, Re-using, was huge. It seemed that we had the awareness that big changes needed to happen. Thirty years later, the foundational problems persist. We still rely on energy sources that ravage and pollute our environments and make our home less healthy, and in the case of nuclear fission, more precarious. We still use an outdated method of food cultivation and distribution which may boost some of those ‘economic’ figures on a screen for some big companies, but which deplete the soil and people’s health. There have been many encouraging developments, but these underlying problems remain. All the while, the ‘climate change industry’ has grown. And with it, the ‘climate change argument/debate’ in which a lot of hot air is pumped out as people argue about opinions and interpretations of data.

For me, these arguments are somewhat beside the point. Whether or not human pollution and burning of fossil fuels will lead to however many degrees of global warming is not the real issue. I would say that the real issue is not speculative. The real issue is that as a species we are not living in harmony with our environment. We are not living anywhere near as healthily as we might. Consequently, we are spewing into the atmosphere habits that perpetuate and entrench needless suffering.

Even amongst the pundits who go on about the importance of a ‘strong economy’, some of them also say that health is the ultimate wealth and agree that without health we cannot be happy. When ‘economic growth’ or ‘economy-centric’ policies come with a significant cost to all our health: polluting earth, water, soil and sky, it certainly doesn’t look like a strong ‘economy’ in the true sense of the word. It looks rather like gross mismanagement of the ecos.

So what to do?
Perhaps we can learn from other species. Perhaps we can learn from the observation of nature, as our ancestors who bequeathed us the great, practical riches of our wisdom traditions did. Perhaps we can consider what I will refer to as Econo-bee.

Let me explain.
I’m on the beach in Samara, Costa Rica, talking to a local nature lover. As our conversation goes on she says, “I think I need to take you to the bees.”
“The bees?” I wonder. She then tells me a bit about the bee capsule at Barefeet Biofeedback and the story behind it - I summarise now, and resort to layman’s terms.

“It has long been a legend,” she told me, “that those who keep bees never have asthma, nor do they suffer from other respiratory problems.”
Was this just what people in the England I grew up in - a place largely severed from much of its ancestral wisdom - called ‘an old wives tale’? Or was it one of those old tales that actually contain much truth, much ‘gold’, much practical wisdom?
Well, I guess you guessed that it’s the latter.
In Russia, scientists started researching this. They found that the bees maintained such high air quality (antiviral, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory) within their hives, and such a harmonious frequency, that the beekeepers’ exposure to this ‘super air’ and ‘symphonic field’ (my lay terms) was giving them significant health boosts. The Russian researchers then started successfully treating people with asthma by having them ‘be with the bees’ and breathe the air from the hives.

Meanwhile, in Costa Rica, a young man, still a teenager, has a vision, of how we need to save the bees and how they can help save us. He started looking after local bees and then built a capsule of the type I would soon experience. A capsule similar to those used by ancient Egyptian kings and queens who would meditate or rest in them. While the ancient Egyptians worshipped Horus and Ra, Solar or Sky deities, they also worshipped the bees as the tears of the Sun. And with very good sense too. Without the Sun, we are nothing, no life on Earth. Without the Sun’s emissaries, the great pollinators who allow the earth to give and grow nourishing vegetation, we cannnot survive. No food, no life. The bees were recognised as emissaries of ‘God’, in the sense of the Source of Life, and as deities to be honoured, respected, worshipped. Worshipping the bees means honouring the web of life, respecting all parts of the ecos. Worshipping the bees, the kings and queens would also put themselves in close proximity to them. Which is what I got to experience.

Yoga, traditional Indian systems of knowledge and philosophy, and now modern science all recognise that life is pulsation. All living beings are pulsating, vibrating at a certain frequency. Humans who spend time around animals often notice that the animals are quite adept at sensing a human’s ‘vibe’.

When a person enters and lies down in the bee capsule, we are close enough to the hives that our energetic frequency enters the bees’ field. We enter a field in which the bees are constantly working to ensure harmony. The bees start working. They start ‘doing their duty’. True to their nature, they do their dharma, the authentic action which supports the wellbeing of the whole. When we lay down in the capsule, the bees sense us, and ‘do a scan’. Each bee then works to re-harmonise the field, and so help harmonise our field and bring us into resonance, into cohesive balance and harmony. Natural medicine fit for a Pharaoh.

I found my time with the bees wonderfully healing, and it left many layers of imprint, including this idea of econo-bee.

Economic models that ignore a foundation of ecological health are deeply flawed. One way this is evidenced is by how our so called ‘economic’ model has failed to keep up with changing reality and understandings. In relation to food for example, it is based on systems of ‘production’ and methods of distribution that seemed a good idea in the years after the second world war, but which have not made as much sense for decades now. Modern science has long since recognised that harmony and diversity are hallmarks of long-term, sustainable, antifragile, natural systems, and that mass-scale chemical agriculture is not sustainable. Life is constant change. A viable, sustainable system is one that is adaptable, one that is responsive, one that owns and knows that there is no ‘fixed way’. The appropriate response is a thing of the particular moment. A strong economy is one based on the reality of ecology: that recognises the cyclical nature of life, that is diverse, locally variant, adaptable. It does not put all its eggs into one, or just a few baskets.

Human craziness can appear to be deeply entrenched, a habit with a lot of inertia. But the bees remind us, there is another way. So what do I mean by econo-bee, or learning from the bees’ society?

First, the bees take responsiility for their own health and harmony. When in balance and harmony, they then contribute to the wellbeing of the wider community and beyond. They contribute to the wellbeing of the whole, a principle known in Sanskṛt as lokasaṅgraha.

Sometimes people talk about a supposedly ‘major’ difference between political conservatives who think that the way to wellness is personal responsibility and to ‘pull oneself up by one’s bootstraps’, and socialists, who believe that the government or state should provide a safety net and ensure certain opportunities and services for all. I do not belong to any particular political party, but neither do I see these ideas as having to be contradictory. Rather, could we recognise them as two mutually complementary aspects of a healthy society?

I certainly agree that we each have to take responsibility for our actions and motivations. But at the same time, it is normal in life that sometimes we will need ‘a little help from our friends’. We no longer live in tribes of a couple of hundred people. Many of the things we do, like travel significant distances, like undergo expensive medical treatments, like gather to study, work, play with people from different places, are things that many, many people are involved in. They impact the whole, global community. It makes sense to collaborate to provide public transport, education and health care. It makes it more efficient for almost everyone.

So how about we learn from the bees? Take care of ourselves and our homes so we are better able to share positively with the wider world, so we are better able to help those in need. Sooner or later, we are likely to be in need one way or another. Even if we are not, when we act for the good of the whole, lokasaṅgraha, each of us is rewarded, each of us gets to live in a healthier, more harmonious hive of creative possibility, of vibrance, congruence and greater efficiency.

Looking after ourselves and our home also means looking after the bees, means looking after the soil, the air and water quality. Scientific research is showing that organic, local produce is vastly more nutritious than the misleadingly and I would say somewhat criminally named ‘conventional’ produce grown with chemical fertilisers and pesticides that have been ‘conventional’ only since the Second World War. Nature is amazingly abundant. We may trash our home to the degree that it is uninhabitable for humans, Nature will survive, no problem. I would suggest that if we are to survive and thrive as we really can, we need to shed this artificial lab coat trying to mask our insecurities, we need to shed this idea of thinking we can govern, dominate, control Nature. How about we abandon the delusion that this Earth is our possession? And then enjoy the lightness and spaciousness of a new way? A way of collaboration with Nature. That works with its diversity, its resilience, its beauty, that repectfully harnesses its abundance and munificence?

We have a lot of time-proven understanding of how to tend land sustainably, how to grow real food. It is our economic model that needs updating. The way of domination and exploitation does not work, has already malfunctioned. Our overly large scale and ultimately damaging and wasteful methods of cultivation and distribution need reform.

When I lived in Thailand, the 9th King of the Chakri dynasty, Bhumibol Adulyadej was still alive and the longest reigning monarch then on the earth. He was already elderly and not so active in public life as he had been. At that time - early 2000s - his major project, the idea that he had been advocating was the ‘sufficiency economy’. Thailand is a land of plenty. We should look after our abundant resources, feed ourselves, produce for our essential needs and then share, sell, export the surplus, engaging in mutually beneficial trade not from a place of need, but from a place of sufficiency, of ‘enoughness’. I am summarising this in broad brush strokes, but it appealed to me then, and it still does. Unlike its neighbours, Thailand was never colonised. The kings of the Chakri dynasty demonstrated a keen intuition and sage foresight when it came to long-term viability. I think in terms of the sufficiency economy model, King Bhumibol Adulyadej was continuing this legacy. I also think it’s a lot like the bees, the great pollinators revered by kings and queens of a much older great dynasty. First, they tend to the harmony of their immediate hive, or home. Then, healthy and vibrant, they go about spreading health and vibrance, pollinating, helping fertilise and distribute nutrients for the good of the whole land and its inhabitants of so many different species.

I would suggest that when we engage in practical efforts to reconnect to the soil, and to care for the pollinators, we will be able to see myriad ways to support a large human population from a place of vibrant harmony and abundance.

Here is a link to https://barefeetbiofeedback.com/ where I got to experience being with the bees like this.

0 Comments

Into the Grey

1/27/2020

1 Comment

For some time now I have been feeling to write an article about what I see as the need to go beyond divisive black and white thinking and step ‘into the grey’, to honestly, courageously wrestle with the nuance of reality and the complexity of life’s challenges.

Following my last newsletter, a couple of people contacted me asking if I might explain my views on travel, especially in the context of ‘climate’. It appears that for some people, air travel, along with eating meat, or accepting a plastic bag for example, has become something of a badge of dishonour. It has been placed on a ‘blacklist’ of banned items: ‘evil’ actions to be avoided, ‘irresponsible’ things that ‘should not be done’, ‘that should not be tolerated’… I feel rather that if anything should be ‘blacklisted’, it should be this type of extreme and reductive, absolutist attitude and its attendant sweeping blanket statements.

In recent times, I have noticed quite a lot of very extreme, polarising language in public discourse. I think we can do a lot better. I feel that exclusive, condemnatory or absolutist statements often block or limit the type of deeper deliberation and broader discussion that can help us move forwards to deal positively with the complex challenges we face as a species.

A foundational yoga teaching: sometimes that which would ordinarily be unconscionable is actually the appropriate action.

There is no list of ‘don’ts’ in yoga. If you see such a thing, it is a reductive interpretation of a subtler, more nuanced teaching. Yoga, like all the major traditional systems of Indian Art, Science and Knowledge, recognises that anything and everything in existence can be poison, anything and everything in existence can be medicine. It all depends: on the situation, the constitution, and the dose.

Another foundational teaching of Yoga: Life, Nature, is not black and white.

Life, Nature, is a realm of nuance in which there are always many, many more ways of looking at a question than from just two sides. There are infinite ‘sides’, shades, perspectives. So rather than dos and don’ts, rather than reductive lists and black and white thinking, yoga invites us into the grey: to wrestle with our conscience, to explore the ‘darklands’ that our conditioning may shield us from or blind us to.

With regard to the ‘climate’ or environment ‘issue’, for example, I had a powerful experience that showed me how much my prejudices or belief systems influenced how I perceived and even was able to perceive the issue.

A decade or so ago, I saw a film that was being promoted by the 350 organisation, (who were saying that we need to keep carbon parts per million below 350 if we are to survive as a species). The bigger message of the film, as it landed with me, was that we need to do a better job of looking after our home, this planet, that we need to start changing some of our inefficient and polluting habits: like shipping food hundreds and thousands of miles instead of eating predominatly local and seasonal food; like drinking water out of plastic bottles that are shipped hundreds or thousands of miles instead of investing in clean, healthy drinking water on tap all around the world, and so on.

Sympathetic to the film’s global message, I ‘swallowed’ its contents whole. Convinced of the good intentions of the makers and recognising from personal experience that many of the ideas they highlighted were real and true, I found myself easily persuaded by some of the other ideas that were novel to me. Enthusiastically, and with good intention, I sent an email encouraging all my friends and contacts to see this film and share its important message.

One of my friends wrote back asking, “Have you seen this other film James? You might want to have a look before you endorse this other one so unequivocally.” My friend pointed this out in a very humane way. He invited me to consider some additional perspectives. This was a man I met regularly and knew to be a person of integrity. I followed his tip and watched this other film. It presented a very different perspective on the issue, one that could perhaps be described as that of a ‘thinking skeptic’. This second film presented ideas that challenged some things I had previously felt quite convinced about. I also felt that its spirit went against certain ideals or values that for me ran much deeper than the particular arguments about ‘speculative science based on modelling’. I felt this second film ignored what for me was the bigger, underlying point, of our need to change the way we relate to ‘ecos’, to our home this Earth. I noticed though, that I watched this second film through very different eyes from the first, whose overall message by and large accorded with the ideas that I had brought with me to the cinema. When watching the second film, I noticed that my critical, analytical toolkit was instantly activated. As I was watching, I was instantaneously picking holes in its arguments. I was very aware of how certain things were being presented in a selective, partial, biased way. But what my friend’s prompting me to consider this other perspective left me with was an undeniable recognition that the first film had also presented things in a selective, partial, and yes, biased way. But as its general message accorded with my pre-existing sympathies and ‘alignments’, I had not examined all its arguments with anything like the same rigour as for the second film. This made me see that I too had been somewhat ‘selective’. It had been easy and expedient to align with a particular ‘side’. But this experience showed me that I had been deluding myself. Both ‘sides’ had the gall to present in a skewed way, in a manipulative, partial way. Both sides presented as ‘unassailable’ fact things which were really just ‘pieces’ of a much bigger and more complex picture. The inconvenient truth* of the matter was not black and white. It was grey. The truth was in the grey. (*The two films I saw were not Al Gore’s film of this name, though both did reference it if I recall correctly. The film associated with the 350 organisation was called The Age of Stupid. I do not recall the name of the second film, and the emails are in a now many-years obsolete account I no longer have access to).

The Truth of things is grey.

A little while after this, I had the privilege of meeting Satish Kumar speaking on Soil, Soul and Society in my hometown in the North of England. Satish gave a memorable talk and facilitated a day which has been of great lasting value for me. One of the particularly memorable messages from what he shared that day was:
“Let us make all isms wasms!”
In other words, let us make divisive, black and white thinking a thing of the past. An ism is a reaction. I’ll mention feminism as an example. Yes, I’m a man. Yes, I’m a ‘white’ man (at least by some people’s standards) in his fifth decade on this Earth. However, I did study British, American, French and Italian feminism and women’s writing when I was an undergraduate and have read several of the classics of feminist literature, so I will dare to mention this ism as an example and I do not do so casually. Like any ism, feminism could be seen to be a reaction to an imbalance, a terrible imbalance. The feminist, or women’s, movement has brought many great benefits, has helped redress some aspects of this imbalance. However, sometimes more extreme voices calling themselves ‘feminist’ go against what I understand to be one of the core principles of earlier feminism: the giving to people who are ‘different’ from, or other than, the dominant/mainstream/establishment the opportunity to live wholly and authentically, bringing the depth and value of their unique gifts to a healthier, wholler, more balanced society. More generally, sometimes, in reacting against the imbalance, the ism becomes ‘anti’ ‘the other’. As soon as an ideology is ‘against’ the other, is anti, is negating, I would say that it reduces vastly its capacity to bring deeper healing and sustainable balance. It risks becoming another type of tyrant. As one of my Indian teachers says, “the crusader gets crusaded.” If we are ‘fighting for peace’, we have to take especial care not to lose our attunement to the ways of peacefulness. We get good at what we practice. Fighting and campaiging we can become ‘good’ at protesting and resisting. Well and good. Sometimes this is exactly what is needed. But there is a danger: that we become entrenched in the ways of the ‘opponent’ or protestor, and that we divert, leak and squander energy that needs to be harnessed for positive, constructive growth.

There is a risk of becoming ‘revolutionaries’ in the most tragic sense of the word. If in railing against the system, we fight it at its own game, and we take on its divisive language, tactics and practices, we take on that which we profess we want to change. There is a very real risk that we can become alternative versions of that which we were so convinced was wrong.

The challenge then is to come out of this ‘revolutionary heritage’, out of the pattern of ‘fighting against’ and overthrowing what we deem to be corrupt, only to replace the corrupt tyranny with another, similar one with a different name, of a different flavour.
The challenge is to be an ‘evolutionary’.
What do I mean?
To be a warrior courageous enough to resist the temptations of retributive stances, punishing policies and reactionary ways. To learn from the past without being burdened or trapped by it. To heal and make whole our inheritance, by drawing out the gifts we can learn from its excesses, its stumblings, its imbalances. By moving forwards in new ways: with new language, with tactics of reconciliation and inclusion, that resist the incendiary, condemnatory, extreme polarities; with practices that promote deep listening, deep witnessing, and genuine consideration of views that we would perhaps reflexively reject or recoil from.

This challenge asks us to bring forth the effort to work together in a more consensual way. It asks us to acknowledge the interwoven complexity and nuance of life. It asks us to abandon the ‘blame game’ and the type of language that can so often put people on the defensive. It requires us to actively remember that we will have a much better chance of fostering a ‘better world’ when we make the patient and courageous effort to embody and share what we really seek, rather than attack what we seek to be rid of.

If we can muster the patience and presence to get past our habits of triggering and inflammatory words, and of allowing ouselves to be easily triggered and inflamed, surely we can access an arena of more fertile and vitalising discourse. If we can inhabit a space of honest discourse more calmly, really, there is so much common ground for us to explore and expand together.

So, all that said, when it comes to travel, I would say that pretty much like anything else it cannot be reduced to a one-size-fits-all policy, to black and white dos and don’ts. I do not think that one-size-fits-all blanket black and white policies can ever bring the sustainable peace, wholeness and harmony that I think is our deeper longing and true potential.
What I can do, if you are interested, is invite you to travel with me into the grey. I can share something about why I value travel so much and how I think travel, even sometimes air travel, can actually be part of a solution: encouraging the type of global perspective and collaborative vision and efforts that the challenges we face require. I’ll continue that in the next article Traveling into the Grey, Part 2.

1 Comment

Weightlessness with Almog Loven - A Recommendation

11/27/2019

0 Comments

What I’ve got from Weightlessness with Almog Loven

I have now had the privilege of attending two Weightlessness weekend programs with Almog Loven in London, 2018 and 2019. Both times, I organised/re-arranged work and international travel commitments so as to be able to attend. Both times it was more than worth it.
In 2018, I signed up for the course as soon as I saw the video which was posted with the announcement. (link at the foot of this post) I had a very strong sense that the program would be something I would enjoy and gain a lot from. My instinct was accurate. Nonetheless, I had not imagined just how nourishing and enriching the program would be.

What did I get from studying with Almog? Affirmation of:
- Be yourself, trust yourself, accept yourself, love yourself. There are infinite ways to do this, always available. You are enough already.
- Whatever you have to do, do it as far as possible in such a way that you allow every cell of your body, every pore of your skin, to smile.
- Meet what arises with a smile. You’ll be able to meet if more fully, more skilfully, and you’ll be able to navigate/inhabit the situation more joyfully.
- As a facilitator: once you’ve developed your toolkit and you know it works, once you’ve thoroughly tested it in the arena of your own life and teaching: then get out of the way and allow yourself to be a conduit for the tools to serve their greater purpose and help us access more of our underlying wholeness and joy.

Both occasions from the Weightlessness weekend, I feel like I received a huge dose of deep nourishment, so affirmative and resonant that it supports me to move more fluidly and efficiently in all the interactions of my life and in my relationship to myself and others months after the program.
Over the years, I have attended some great ‘movement’ programs with really solid, scalable methodology, with safe, inclusive instruction and a great ethos. Almog’s work stands out because it works at the level, I would say, of more of the whole human being. It really does invite us deeper into the recognition that we are enough, and that we have such depths of resources to help and support each other.
For me, this type of work is a way of waging peace. Inviting people to experience how we have such rich resources within is a way to dissolve some of our fears, to peel away some of the weight of our limiting conditionings.

From my perspective, the energy that Almog embodies and shares is a key element here. I would say that Almog is able to graciously offer this invitation because he clearly works from a place of lively presence. He is not forcing an agenda or a particular flow or structure to the sessions. Rather, I witnessed a skillful and courageous facilitator ready to meet the group as we are. From this place of honest presence, Almog invites us into the lived, visceral experience of our own ‘enoughness’. Without forcing anything, the work invites us to experience deeper layers and unfoldings of ‘weightlessness’. For example, at an immediate, physical level, we experience how we can allow functional, beautiful movement with minimum effort and maximum nourishment. At a more holistic level, we gain lived experiences of how we can give, receive, invite and allow support.

Both years, I was hugely impressed by how Almog guided us through the weekend, building a stronger and stronger container in which it was easy for us to dive deeper as a mutually supportive group.
The first year I learnt some new elements that continue to enrich my movement practice. The second year, the movement was not dissimilar, drawing from the same palette, though not the same. What was the same was the spirit of the work. I would describe it as the same river. It has just flown on, gathering greater, nourishing force.
There are some types of workshop programs that one can return to and feel like you didn’t get much compared to the first or last time. This can be the case when the teacher’s work is mainly about sharing nuts and bolts techniques.
However, when the work is about deeper principles which impact all aspects of our life, it can be the other way: each return is an opportunity for deepening. This was my experience my second time with Almog and Weightlessness. The first was easily one of my all-time favourite workshop experiences as a participant. The second one topped it.

I carry with gratitude the gifts that have come to me from my work with Almog. I hope to study with him again and wish that more and more people can experience his great work. To me, it feels like Almog’s work is part of a new paradigm, beyond compartmentalisations and narrow labels. This is not a dance workshop. This is not a movement training. For me, this is about how we relate to ourselves, to others, and to the environment. To my mind, Weightlessness extends a beautiful and highly effective invitation: to skilfully peel away the burdens of our conditioned ideas so we can inhabit our here and now with deepening awareness of the true weight and real light of our conscious human presence.

Link to Weightlessness trailer video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K51B-Qwqg-o

0 Comments

<<Previous

Why Yoga Matters - Buddhiyuktaḥ - Part One

Bhagavad Gītā Chapter Three at MCY April 2020 Session Notes One

YOGA and SPORT part two

On the history of yoga āsana

YOGA and SPORT

HAṬHA YOGA TANTRA

YOGA, AUTHENTICITY AND AUTHORITY

ECONO-BEE

Into the Grey

Weightlessness with Almog Loven - A Recommendation

Author

Categories

Archives

Categories